Real Estate Shops Say Risk Trumps Core in 2015

Posted by

Core real estate will struggle for attention this year, as consultants and fund managers say investor assets – and long-term returns – are more likely to flow to funds plying niche sectors, such as opportunistic, debt, distressed, and overseas properties.

The tilt toward risk was evident last year, but is likely to accelerate in 2015, says Jacques Gordon, global head of research and strategy at LaSalle Investment Management, which has $53 billion in real estate assets.

“2014 was another terrific year for private equity real estate, with continued low economic growth, low interest rates, and low inflation,” he says. “But we know the end of this era of low-low-low is getting nearer.”

Institutional investors, consultants, and fund managers have been moving “up the risk curve” in anticipation, he says. Signs of this cropped up last year, when Preqin data showed opportunistic and Europe-focused strategies were attracting capital, as reported.

“There was really widespread interest in taking on more risk last year,” Gordon adds. “People who have made a lot of money in property are willing … to go into some of the riskier markets.”

Core investing opportunities have gotten extremely thin in terms of properties that are fully leased, need little capital investment, and have long-term income prospects, says Christian Busken, director of real assets at Fund Evaluation Group (FEG), an investment consultant.

“We’re not recommending core real estate for 2015 because we believe the market has become fully valued,” he says. “It has become more or less a fixed income type of investment the last couple of years.”

U.S. institutional investors are expressing a greater appetite for risk in various ways, says Alan Pardee, managing partner at Mercury Capital Advisors, a placement agent. “They’re looking now at funds investing in secondary and tertiary markets,” he says. “They’re looking at credit and debt investments. They’re looking at Europe.”

Real estate managers have been widening their product lineups to meet this demand, launching funds that target specific geographic regions, investment themes, or property segments, as reported.

However, investors are getting choosier in their selection of fund managers, Pardee says. “Even [managers] that have strong teams can end up with tough fundraises,” he says. “It’s a discerning market. Investors want strategies that are replicable and have an attractive [deals] opportunity set.”

The spoils are going to managers that have compelling investment ideas and the right credentials, he adds, citing a recent fund that squarely targeted buying, building, and improvement of parking facilities in China. “You couldn’t get more niche than that,” Pardee says. “And it was oversubscribed.”

Private real estate fund managers already had a solid 2014, having hauled in $90 billion in assets in globally, according to preliminary year-end totals from Preqin. That’s just shy of 2013’s $92 billion, though last year’s tally is likely to increase after stragglers report their totals.

Managers are likely to continue on that pace this year with funds favoring risk, such as opportunistic or value-add strategies that include real estate development or properties seeking new tenants, LaSalle’s Gordon says. “Today, properties that are leased and stabilized are getting single digit returns, 5% real returns, so to double those, you’ve got to do something with the property,” he says.

FEG is recommending that its institutional investor clients look in secondary markets for opportunistic or distressed deals in the U.S. and Europe, Busken says.

Some managers are already reaping the benefits of this turn to risk, including Ares Management, an $80 billion private equity manager that recently closed its eighth U.S. real estate fund – a multi-sector value-add strategy – with $824 million, topping its $750 million target.

Managers are also getting traction with funds investing in foreign markets, Pardee says. “There continues to be attention on Asia as a place to put capital,” he says. “Greater China is still of interest. There is still a desire to put capital there even though there is talk of a slowdown.”

Investors are also targeting Europe, and not just for distressed deals, with some funds aiming for opportunistic assets, Gordon says. “Some of the money that never wanted to look at Europe, because it had a weak story demographically, is now looking there for higher-return investing,” he says. “I’d say the sophisticated money is very country-specific and region-specific, right down to the mandate or the product.”

Ares also recently closed its fourth European real estate fund with $1.3 billion, topping its $1 billion target, with a range of residential, retail, office, and industrial properties in its sights.

Real estate debt is also hot, with a sound showing in 2014, raising $20 billion globally, compared to $16 billion in 2013, according to Preqin.

“Pensions are going into the offices of private equity firms and saying… ‘How can you get me excess yield, better than the basis points I’ve been seeing from fixed income?’” Pardee says. “You have to access the credit markets across the world, find ways to access different parts of the capital structure. We’re seeing more and more real estate debt activity from different people.”

Various firms have been active on the real estate debt front. Earlier this week, Harvard University’s endowment reportedly committed “several million dollars” to AlumCreek Holdings, a new private equity fund targeting distressed and standard commercial mortgage debt, as reported. And KKR reportedly is launching a new debt arm within its real estate unit by hiring a team from Rialto Capital Management, according to the Wall Street Journal.

Distressed investing deals may be harder to find this year, especially with banks in Europe finally repairing their balance sheets, but they are still available in certain markets, Gordon says. “In China, we’re in early days on distressed,” he says. “We understand those kinds of plays have just about run their course in Spain, but now the focus is on Italy.”

Still, Siguler Guff & Co., a $10 billion multi-strategy private equity manager, announced this week it had closed its second distressed real estate multi-manager fund at $877 million, topping its $750 million target, with expectations that it will see even more such deals in Europe’s commercial property sector.

Another area that might get more attention this year is residential single-family housing, via a niche for land deals and development opportunities, rather than housing as a distressed play, Pardee says.

That’s the premise behind RAM Real Estate Capital, which recently launched with a $200 million co-investment fund aimed at capital and equity lending to homebuilders and residential developers, says Rodney Montag, the firm’s CEO and a homebuilders’ market veteran. RAM is underwriting deals in the Southeast, Texas, and the East Coast, and expects to pursue more institutional investor capital in the future.

“The housing market is still at the very early stages of recovery,” Montag says. “It’s taken longer than everybody expected, but we think a longer, smoother recovery is a good thing for investors like us. We’re nowhere close to getting to the historical average number of permits, forget the peak. The housing market has a long way to go.” – Tom Stabile

FundFire is a copyrighted publication. FundFire has agreed to make available its content for the
sole use of the employees of the subscriber company. Accordingly, it is a violation of the
copyright law for anyone to duplicate the content of FundFire for the use of any person, other
than the employees of the subscriber company.

An Information Service of Money-Media, a Financial Times Company


By clicking on this link you will leave the Mercury Capital Advisors, LLC (“Mercury”) website and be taken to a website owned and operated by third parties. These links are provided for your information and convenience only and are not an endorsement by Mercury or the Mercury iFunds™ platform. Mercury has no control over the contents of any linked website and is not responsible for these websites or their content or availability. Mercury therefore makes no warranties or representations, express or implied about such linked websites, the third parties they are owned and operated by, the information contained on them or the suitability or quality of any of their products or services.